<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Case Studies | CoMet Toolkit</title><link>https://www.comet-toolkit.org/meteor/case-studies/</link><atom:link href="https://www.comet-toolkit.org/meteor/case-studies/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Case Studies</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><item><title>Satellite-to-In-Situ Radiometric Validation</title><link>https://www.comet-toolkit.org/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.comet-toolkit.org/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="-background">📈 Background&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) coordinates international activities to assess and improve the quality of Earth observation (EO) satellite measurements.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Key outcomes of this activity are the &lt;strong>Product Validation Platform (CEOS-PVP)&lt;/strong> and the &lt;strong>RadVAL Dashboard&lt;/strong>, which provides satellite-to-in-situ validation results and long-term radiometric stability monitoring for EO missions.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The comparison system is implemented using the &lt;strong>NPL MetEOR Toolkit&lt;/strong>, which performs matchup processing, uncertainty propagation and statistical analysis.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>For a full overview of the CEOS PVP activity, visit:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>👉 &lt;a href="https://www.ceos-pvp.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.ceos-pvp.org/&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;figure >
&lt;div class="flex justify-center ">
&lt;div class="w-100" >&lt;img alt="CEOS RadVAL workflow showing data collection, comparison and visualisation stages." srcset="
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/ceos-pvp_breakdown_hu3430672699925049888.webp 400w,
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/ceos-pvp_breakdown_hu1691760445472067990.webp 760w,
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/ceos-pvp_breakdown_hu6729979879208669689.webp 1200w"
src="https://www.comet-toolkit.org/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/ceos-pvp_breakdown_hu3430672699925049888.webp"
width="760"
height="377"
loading="lazy" data-zoomable />&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="-meteor-processing">☄️ MetEOR Processing&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The RadVAL workflow compares satellite observations with highly characterised reference measurements from ground-based calibration sites.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>To create comparable observations, MetEOR performs three key processing steps:&lt;/p>
&lt;ol>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Spectral integration&lt;/strong> of hyperspectral reference measurements using the satellite spectral response function.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Temporal interpolation&lt;/strong> to the satellite overpass time.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Spatial aggregation&lt;/strong> of satellite pixels within the site&amp;rsquo;s region of interest.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ol>
&lt;p>The resulting matchup pairs allow the bias between satellite and reference observations to be evaluated for each sensor band and overpass.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A detailed description of the methodology is available at:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>👉 &lt;a href="https://www.ceos-pvp.org/methods" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.ceos-pvp.org/methods&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="-uncertainty-analysis">✓ Uncertainty Analysis&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Alongside the measurement comparison, MetEOR evaluates uncertainty contributions from the satellite observations, reference measurements and comparison process.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The uncertainty structure used within the RadVAL analysis is summarised below.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;figure >
&lt;div class="flex justify-center ">
&lt;div class="w-100" >&lt;img alt="Uncertainty tree diagram for multispectral satellite-to-in-situ comparisons. Adapted from the CEOS RadVAL methodology." srcset="
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/unc_tree_diagram_hu7622121031194513482.webp 400w,
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/unc_tree_diagram_hu6652445591376447511.webp 760w,
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/unc_tree_diagram_hu16340318982160063019.webp 1200w"
src="https://www.comet-toolkit.org/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/unc_tree_diagram_hu7622121031194513482.webp"
width="760"
height="386"
loading="lazy" data-zoomable />&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Further details are available in the report:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>👉 &lt;em>Multispectral Satellite-to-In-Situ Comparison Uncertainty Budget&lt;/em>&lt;br>
&lt;a href="https://www.ceos-pvp.org/download/multispectral-uncertainty-report" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.ceos-pvp.org/download/multispectral-uncertainty-report&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="-results">📂 Results&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The processed comparisons are published through the &lt;strong>RadVAL Dashboard&lt;/strong>, where time series of satellite-reference bias can be explored for different sensors, spectral bands and validation sites.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The resulting records provide an indicator of sensor radiometric stability through time:&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Consistent bias indicates stable sensor performance.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Gradual changes may indicate sensor drift.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Abrupt changes can reveal calibration updates or instrument anomalies.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>The dashboard also displays uncertainty estimates arising from the satellite measurements, reference observations and comparison methodology.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>
&lt;figure >
&lt;div class="flex justify-center ">
&lt;div class="w-100" >&lt;img alt="Example RadVAL timeseries output." srcset="
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/radval_timeseries_hu3397989500581534390.webp 400w,
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/radval_timeseries_hu1868335800560820151.webp 760w,
/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/radval_timeseries_hu13807377376574991538.webp 1200w"
src="https://www.comet-toolkit.org/meteor/case-studies/ceos-pvp/radval_timeseries_hu3397989500581534390.webp"
width="760"
height="396"
loading="lazy" data-zoomable />&lt;/div>
&lt;/div>&lt;/figure>
&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="-explore-the-results">✓ Explore the Results&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>Interactive RadVAL products are available at:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>👉 &lt;a href="https://www.ceos-pvp.org/radval-dashboard" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.ceos-pvp.org/radval-dashboard&lt;/a>&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="-summary">✓ Summary&lt;/h3>
&lt;p>This case study demonstrates how &lt;strong>MetEOR&lt;/strong> enables traceable, uncertainty-aware satellite-to-in-situ radiometric validation within the &lt;strong>CEOS RadVAL&lt;/strong> framework.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>By combining robust matchup processing with uncertainty analysis, the system supports the monitoring of radiometric stability across Earth observation satellite missions.****&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>