Satellite-to-In-Situ Radiometric Validation

Nov 9, 2026ยท
Samantha Malone
Samantha Malone
Sam E. Hunt
Sam E. Hunt
Rasma Ormane
Rasma Ormane
ยท 2 min read
Image credit: NASA

๐Ÿ“ˆ Background

The Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) coordinates international activities to assess and improve the quality of Earth observation (EO) satellite measurements.

Key outcomes of this activity are the Product Validation Platform (CEOS-PVP) and the RadVAL Dashboard, which provides satellite-to-in-situ validation results and long-term radiometric stability monitoring for EO missions.

The comparison system is implemented using the NPL MetEOR Toolkit, which performs matchup processing, uncertainty propagation and statistical analysis.

For a full overview of the CEOS PVP activity, visit:

๐Ÿ‘‰ https://www.ceos-pvp.org/

CEOS RadVAL workflow showing data collection, comparison and visualisation stages.

โ˜„๏ธ MetEOR Processing

The RadVAL workflow compares satellite observations with highly characterised reference measurements from ground-based calibration sites.

To create comparable observations, MetEOR performs three key processing steps:

  1. Spectral integration of hyperspectral reference measurements using the satellite spectral response function.
  2. Temporal interpolation to the satellite overpass time.
  3. Spatial aggregation of satellite pixels within the site’s region of interest.

The resulting matchup pairs allow the bias between satellite and reference observations to be evaluated for each sensor band and overpass.

A detailed description of the methodology is available at:

๐Ÿ‘‰ https://www.ceos-pvp.org/methods

โœ“ Uncertainty Analysis

Alongside the measurement comparison, MetEOR evaluates uncertainty contributions from the satellite observations, reference measurements and comparison process.

The uncertainty structure used within the RadVAL analysis is summarised below.

Uncertainty tree diagram for multispectral satellite-to-in-situ comparisons. Adapted from the CEOS RadVAL methodology.

Further details are available in the report:

๐Ÿ‘‰ Multispectral Satellite-to-In-Situ Comparison Uncertainty Budget
https://www.ceos-pvp.org/download/multispectral-uncertainty-report

๐Ÿ“‚ Results

The processed comparisons are published through the RadVAL Dashboard, where time series of satellite-reference bias can be explored for different sensors, spectral bands and validation sites.

The resulting records provide an indicator of sensor radiometric stability through time:

  • Consistent bias indicates stable sensor performance.
  • Gradual changes may indicate sensor drift.
  • Abrupt changes can reveal calibration updates or instrument anomalies.

The dashboard also displays uncertainty estimates arising from the satellite measurements, reference observations and comparison methodology.

Example RadVAL timeseries output.

โœ“ Explore the Results

Interactive RadVAL products are available at:

๐Ÿ‘‰ https://www.ceos-pvp.org/radval-dashboard

โœ“ Summary

This case study demonstrates how MetEOR enables traceable, uncertainty-aware satellite-to-in-situ radiometric validation within the CEOS RadVAL framework.

By combining robust matchup processing with uncertainty analysis, the system supports the monitoring of radiometric stability across Earth observation satellite missions.****

Samantha Malone
Authors
Samantha Malone
Scientist, NPL
Sam E. Hunt
Authors
Sam E. Hunt
Senior Scientist, NPL
Sam’s work aims to improve the quality of and confidence in satellite Earth observations, using insights from metrology.
Rasma Ormane
Authors
Rasma Ormane
Scientist, NPL
Rasma’s work aims to research and communicate relevant developments in the field of climate and earth observations.